Tải bản đầy đủ

Business valuation theory and practice


Business Valuation

Marco Fazzini

Business Valuation
Theory and Practice

Marco Fazzini
European University of Rome
Rome, Italy

ISBN 978-3-319-89493-5    ISBN 978-3-319-89494-2 (eBook)

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018938559
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the
whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or
information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does
not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective
laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are
believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors
give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions
that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
Cover image © blackred/Getty Images
Cover design by Ran Shauli
Printed on acid-free paper
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer International
Publishing AG part of Springer Nature.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

To Cesare and Giacomo,
may they appreciate the value of what really matters in life


If you are leafing through this book you might wonder whether a new textbook on business valuation is really necessary, as so many books have been
published on this subject in recent years. In my opinion there is still something to say; let me try to explain why.
First, many textbooks address business valuation as if the valuation method
were all that mattered.
In fact, most business valuation textbooks are specifically focused on calculation methods. Unquestionably, these play a very important role, as they are
the formal part of the entire process. The risk, however, is to place too much
emphasis on the quantitative dimension, without adequately considering the
context in which the valuation is made.
The method chosen is the result of a broader analysis through which the
characteristics of the firm are investigated. It is the method that must adapt to
reality not the other way around.

The purpose of this textbook is to offer a guideline for the application of an
integrated approach, thereby avoiding “copy and paste” valuations, based on
prepackaged parameters and the uncritical use of models. Specifically, an
Integrated Valuation Approach (IVA) should be adopted that encompasses,
within any specific method, a wide range of elements reflecting the characteristics and specificities of the firm to be valued.
Secondly, many textbooks do not adequately consider the role of valuation
standards. In both the literature and professional practice, business valuation
is now circumscribed to some specific models, although many variations can
be found in their practical application. Valuation standards allow for an alignment of both the methods and their application, providing a common basis
for valuers. This book is based on the International Valuation Standards

viii  Preface

(IVS) issued by the International Valuation Standards Council. These standards significantly help the valuation work, both generally (scope of the work,
investigation and compliance, reporting, basis of value, valuation approaches
and methods) and specifically (business interests, intangibles, plant and equipment, real property, development properties, financial instruments), and provide useful indications.
To write this book I had to take time away from my family; thus, I am
grateful to my wife Laura and my children for their patience and to whom I
dedicate this book.
Rome, Italy

Marco Fazzini, PhD


1Value, Valuation, and Valuer   1
2Integrated Valuation Approach (IVA)  23
3Financial Statement Analysis  39
4Income-Based Method  77
5Market-Based Method 123
6The Cost Approach 175
7Intangible Assets Valuation 183
8Premiums and Discounts in Business Valuation 209
Index 219


List of Figures

Fig. 1.1
Fig. 1.2
Fig. 2.1
Fig. 3.1
Fig. 3.2
Fig. 3.3
Fig. 3.4
Fig. 3.5
Fig. 3.6
Fig. 3.7
Fig. 3.8
Fig. 3.9
Fig. 3.10
Fig. 3.11
Fig. 3.12
Fig. 3.13
Fig. 3.14
Fig. 3.15
Fig. 3.16
Fig. 3.17
Fig. 3.18
Fig. 3.19
Fig. 3.20
Fig. 3.21
Fig. 4.1
Fig. 4.2
Fig. 4.3

Range of plausible values
General requirements of a valuation report
Investments and financial sources
Functional reformulation of the balance sheet
Relationship between assets and liabilities
Reclassification example
Net assets
Working capital
Business assets
Non-current net debt
Current net debt
Net debt
Financial statement at a glance
The income statement
Reclassified income statement
Gross margin distribution
Cash flow statement
Example of financial statement
Business assets
Turnover of individual assets
Mismatch between profit and cash flow
Balance between investments and financial sources
A part of current assets is covered by long-term sources
A part of non-current assets is covered by current debt
Asset-side and equity-side valuation
The logic of discounting
Comparison between the returns of different government bonds




Fig. 4.4
Fig. 4.5
Fig. 5.1
Fig. 5.2
Fig. 5.3
Fig. 8.1

List of Figures

CAPM at a glance
Cash flows and EBITs trend
Asset-side and equity-side approaches
EV/EBITDA % change over one year
EV/FCF and EV/Sales regression
Basics of value. (Source: NACVA, Valuation Discount and
Premiums, 2012)
Fig. 8.2 Control premium and discount for lack of control


List of Tables

Table 1.1
Table 2.1
Table 3.1
Table 3.2
Table 3.3
Table 3.4
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 4.4
Table 4.5
Table 4.6
Table 4.7
Table 4.8
Table 4.9
Table 4.10
Table 4.11
Table 4.12
Table 4.13
Table 4.14
Table 4.15
Table 4.16
Table 4.17
Table 4.18
Table 4.19
Table 4.20
Table 4.21
Table 5.1

Facebook financial key figures and market value (2013–2016)
Amazon.com statement of operations (in $ millions)
Cost of sales
Operating working capital turnover
Dividend payout ratio and sustainable growth rate
Effect of a decrease in revenues
US Treasuries yields (first semester 2017)
Euro Area Yield Curve (November 2017)
Beta by industry in the US, Europe, and Japan
Peer group beta
Business unit key data
Business unit’s levered betas
ERP by country
Sensitivity analysis on CAPM
Sensitivity analysis on total value
Rating definitions
Example of expected cash flows series
Cash flows versus EBIT
Value of the firm without growth rate
Value of the firm with growth rate
Value of the firm using an EBITDA multiple
Cash flow statement
Asset-side valuation
Equity-side valuation
Expected earnings
Expected dividend per share
Value per share
Key statistics of food and beverage industry



List of Tables

Table 5.2
Table 5.3
Table 5.4
Table 5.5
Table 5.6
Table 5.7
Table 5.8
Table 5.9
Table 5.10
Table 5.11
Table 5.12
Table 5.13
Table 5.14
Table 5.15
Table 5.16
Table 5.17
Table 5.18
Table 5.19
Table 5.20
Table 5.21
Table 5.22
Table 5.23
Table 5.24
Table 5.25
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Table 7.1
Table 7.2
Table 7.3
Table 7.4
Table 7.5
Table 7.6
Table 7.7
Table 7.8
Table 7.9
Table 7.10
Table 7.11
Table 7.12

Comparison between two peer groups
Peer group’s standard deviation
Standard deviation of EV/EBITDA
Correlation between multiples and EBITDA margin
Application of the EV/Sales
Application of the EV/EBITDA
Application of the EV/EBIT
EV/EBITDA and EV/EBIT in automotive industry
(Q1 2016, Source: Capital IQ)
The peer group
Evolution of the EV/EBITDA multiple
Evolution of the EV/EBIT multiple
YoY percentage change of the EV/EBITDA multiple
YoY percentage change of the EV/EBIT multiple
Multiples standard deviation (2005–2015)
Application of P/E ratio
Application of P/E ratio
Beverage companies multiples ($ mil)
Multiples statistics
Distribution in quartiles
Multiples statistics without outliers
Distribution in quartiles without outliers
Target company’s income statement
Enterprise value of the target company
Stress test matrix
Book value of the firm
Adjustment to book value
Investments in intangible assets (% officially measured
value added)
Factors considered in the adjustment of the royalty rate
Comparable transactions royalty rate
Value of the patent
With and Without scenarios
Value of the brand by comparing the “With” and “Without”
Value of the brand by comparing the value of the firm in the
“With” and “Without” scenarios
Revenue and expenses related to the contributory assets
Contributory assets charges (fixed assets and working capital)
Contributory assets charges (fixed assets and working capital)
Greenfield method
Average salary per person

  List of Tables 

Table 7.13 Statistics on recruitment cost and on unproductive
training period
Table 7.14 Value of the workforce calculation
Table 7.15 Replacement cost of software
Table 7.16 Replacement cost new
Table 7.17 Functional obsolescence
Table 7.18 Economic obsolescence
Table 7.19 Value of software
Table 8.1 Control premium and controlling interest



Value, Valuation, and Valuer

1.1 What Does Making a Valuation Mean?
In life we continuously make valuations. When we go shopping, for example,
we make sure that the proposed price reflects quality; when we book a room,
we make sure that the rate is in line with the hotel features and the services it
offers; when we choose a school for our kids, we assess the quality of the programs and the teachers’ standing; when we buy a house, we make sure that the
value is in line with that of other houses in the neighborhood.
In short, valuations are part of our daily experience; generally, they consist
of two components: an objective one, which regards the intrinsic value, and a
subjective one, linked to the valuer’s perception of the object to be valued.
Separating these two components is difficult, as our choice is never entirely
based on either the subjective or the objective component, but on a mix of
both. For example, when buying a house, we do not choose the house with
the best price per square foot, regardless of its characteristics; nor do we solely
rely on our aesthetic perceptions, neglecting the price. Not surprisingly, we
make choices based on a trade-off between objective circumstances (price)
and subjective perceptions (location, finishes, interior design, etc.).
This mechanism is easy to find in contemporary art auctions. Given an
objective value, based on previous auctions, expert judgment, quality of the
work, and so on, the results may differ significantly, reaching amounts that
have little to do with the characteristics of the work or with the prices attained
in previous auctions.

© The Author(s) 2018
M. Fazzini, Business Valuation, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89494-2_1



M. Fazzini

Business valuations work in the same way. There is an objective component
of value, based on valuations methods, and a subjective one, based on the
valuer’s experience and ability to capture reality.
This means that two equally knowledgeable persons, with similar sensitivity, will hardly get the same result, although they start from the same assumptions and quantitative inputs. To make a comparison, think of two chefs who
are given the same ingredients to prepare a certain dish. The result may appear
similar, but the different combination of timing, cooking processes, doses,
creativity, experience, and dish presentation will lead to different outcomes.
In this book, we will deal with the objective component, which is how we
determine the value of a business based on generally accepted valuation
What does it mean to value a business? We can respond that valuation is
the act of estimating or setting the potential value of a business by considering
both internal and external variables.
The internal variables look at the results a firm has achieved in the past; for
example, the debt-to-equity ratio, EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation, and amortization), revenues, and cash flow provide us with an
understanding of what characterizes the business and constitute a basis for
determining its value. The external variables look at the environment in which
the company conducts its business and include, for example, market features,
the company’s competitive positioning, distribution channels, or consumers’
tastes. In short, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive opinion that
encompasses in one single model both the theoretical business value and the
value that considers the environment where that business develops and performs its activity.
This is why the method presented in this volume is called integrated valuation approach (IVA). According to this approach, the evaluation process does
not end with the application of a model, but requires considering the business
as a whole.

1.2 The Business Valuation
Valuing a business is a complex exercise for various reasons.
First of all, the characteristics of the business change quickly. Over time,
changes may occur that affect the value of the business, for example, a reduction in profit, higher investments, new debts, different revenues. Value, therefore, is neither constant nor immutable, but must refer to a specific date and
situation. A valuer is like a photographer who has to take a picture of a ­moving

  Value, Valuation, and Valuer 


object. To obtain a clear image he or she needs the right camera and the right
setup and must have enough experience for this type of shot. Likewise, valuers
must be able both to choose the model that better interprets the value and to
apply it correctly.
Secondly, the value of a firm can be seen from different perspectives. As we will
see further on, we can use methods that are based on expected cash flows
(income methods, see Chap. 4), market values (market methods, see Chap.
5), and reproduction/replacement cost (cost method, see Chap. 6). Each of
them considers some specific aspects of the firm and can lead to partially different results. As mentioned in IVS 105 (International Valuation Standard
105) “the goal in selecting valuation approaches and methods for an asset is to
find the most appropriate method under particular circumstances. No one
method is suitable in every possible situation.” Valuers must therefore apply
their experience and judgment to identify the most suitable approach; it
means that value depends not only on business characteristics but also on the
model applied.
Furthermore, not all assets can be measured. The value drivers of a firm are
often based on elements that can only be quantified through the output they
produce. For example, the value of Facebook is linked to assets such as the
number of users, competitive positioning compared to other social networks,
the ability to innovate, and integration with other platforms such as Instagram
and WhatsApp. Evaluating Facebook based on financial figures only could be
an oversimplification.
As shown in Table  1.1, the market value of Facebook rose by 109.80%
from 2013 to 2014, from $66.4 billion to $139.3 billion. Assuming there is
no constant relationship between market value and financial data (otherwise
we would now have the “safe” investment formula), none of the key figures
have changed in the same way as market value. Expectations about the company’s value were evidently higher than the results achieved. Market value
increased more than proportionally compared to key financial figures also
from 2014 to 2015.
Table 1.1  Facebook financial key figures and market value (2013–2016)
data ($/Mil)
Income from
Free cash flow
Market value





$66,420 109.80





$139,350 56.39







$217,930 39.19



M. Fazzini

It was only from 2015 to 2016 that the increase in market value was lower,
probably due to investors’ perception of a stronger alignment between key
financial figures and market value.
Hence, financial results do not perfectly reflect the value of a firm and,
although they are the basis on which business valuation is built, there are
other aspects that cannot be measured reliably.
Finally, there is a difference between price and value: in an ideal world they
should coincide, but in practice they may differ, and the gap can be
Price is the amount requested to purchase an asset. It is an empirical quantity that is influenced by supply and demand. Value, on the other hand, is the
result of an estimate and may reflect a potential price in a transaction between
two independent parties.
Here are some examples to help you better understand this price/value gap.
A cotton T-shirt made by an haute couture company, with a modest intrinsic value of a few dollars, is put on the market at a price of tens or hundreds
of dollars. In this case, price is higher than the value of the good.
Here is another example: in a crisis situation, people may have to sell out
some of their property (e.g. jewelry, buildings, art collections) for amounts
lower than their intrinsic value. In this case, price is lower than value.
We face the same problem when valuing a company. How much is 2% of
a small firm’s equity worth when another shareholder owns the other 98%? In
theory, that stake is worth 2% of the total value of the company; in practice,
the price may be impossible to define or close to zero, as there would be no
buyer due to lack of marketability. Indeed, who would want to spend money
to buy a minority interest that (a) is difficult to sell and (b) has absolutely no
influence on the majority shareholder? In this case, again, price and value may
have no correlation at all.
If we generalize the concept, value reflects a potentiality; price, on the other
hand, reflects the here and now. The misalignment between value and price is
sometimes significant, but no amount is “truer than another”. They can both
be justified, depending on the characteristics of the good to be traded and the
circumstances. Moreover, as Oscar Wilde once said, “nowadays people know
the price of everything and the value of nothing”.

1.3 What Is Value?
“Value” is not a concept that can be easily enclosed in a universally valid definition; there is no unique measure for it, not even from a quantitative standpoint, since, depending on the instruments used, the data taken as reference,

  Value, Valuation, and Valuer 


Range of

Not realistic values
Fig. 1.1  Range of plausible values

and the interpretation proposed, we may obtain different results, all of them
equally plausible and consistent.
Correctly applying a formula is not enough to reach the reasonable certainty that the result is the value of the entity, since it is highly unlikely that an
equation can capture the complex set of conditions surrounding a firm.
A value is much more likely to be defined, in quantitative terms, through a
range of plausible values, the breadth of which depends on methodological
accuracy and the ability of the model to interpret the business specificities
(Fig. 1.1).
Value, therefore, is neither an absolute nor a unique concept. There is, actually, more than one configuration of value, depending on the purpose of the
assignment and the characteristics of the business. This is precisely why referring to bases of value is more appropriate, as suggested by the IVSs.
According to IVS 104, “bases of value (sometimes called standards of value)
describe the fundamental premises on which the reported values will be
based”. The standard adds that “it is critical that the basis (or bases) of value
be appropriate to the terms and purpose of the valuation assignment, as a
basis of value may influence or dictate a valuer’s selection of methods, inputs
and assumptions, and the ultimate opinion of value”.

1.3.1 Common Elements of the Bases of Value
As described in IVS 104, while there are different bases of value used in valuations, most have certain common elements:
1 . an assumed transaction;
2. an assumed date of the transaction; and
3. the assumed parties to the transaction.


M. Fazzini  Assumed Transaction
According to IVS 104, depending on the basis of value, the assumed transaction could take different forms:
(a) a hypothetical transaction;
(b) an actual transaction;
(c) a purchase (or entry) transaction;
(d) a sale (or exit) transaction; and/or
(e)a transaction in a particular or hypothetical market with specified
A transaction is hypothetical when the other party has not yet been identified or the time is not ripe to initiate a transaction. For example, a valuer
could be appointed by the shareholders to evaluate a company in the event of
a potential sale, in order to identify a range of plausible values to be used as
reference for the deal.
A transaction is actual if both the asset to be valued and the parties are known,
there being, however, no specific constraints regarding the type of transaction.
A purchase transaction or a sale transaction imposes greater constraints on
valuers, as they may be required to consider the value of potential synergies or
potential valuation discounts or premiums.
Finally, a transaction in a particular or hypothetical market with specified
characteristics requires that the valuer examines and is familiar with some
specific aspects. For example, in a transaction involving financial assets in a
Middle Eastern country, a valuer should be familiar with the fundamentals of
Islamic finance and be able to distinguish between legal (halal), non-risky
(gharār), and non-speculative (maysīr) investments.  Assumed Date of the Transaction
The assumed date of a transaction influences what information and data a
valuer has to consider in a valuation. Value is indeed a matter of timing and
the assumed date is a relevant variable, especially in a dynamic context characterized by frequent changes.  Assumed Parties to the Transaction
Identifying the parties also plays an essential role in the valuation process,
since, as noted in IVS 104, “most bases of value reflect assumptions concerning

  Value, Valuation, and Valuer 


the parties to a transaction and provide a certain level of description of the parties”. IVS 104 underlines that “in respect to these parties, they could include
one or more actual or assumed characteristics, such as: hypothetical, known, or
specific parties, members of an identified/described group of potential parties;
whether the parties are subject to particular conditions or motivations at the
assumed date (e.g. duress), and/ or: an assumed knowledge level”.

1.3.2 Bases of Value
IVS defines to following bases of value:

market value;
market rent;
equitable value;
investment value/worth;
synergistic value;
liquidation value.

According to IVS 104, market value is the “estimated amount for which an
asset or liability should exchange on the valuation date between a willing
buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction, after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion”.
Market value, in accordance with the IVS conceptual framework, is “the
most probable price reasonably obtainable in the market on the valuation
date”. In other words, it is the best price reasonably obtainable by the seller
and the most advantageous price reasonably obtainable by the buyer. The
market value of an asset reflects its highest and best use, that is, the use of an
asset that maximizes its potential and that is possible, legally permissible, and
financially feasible.
According to IVS 104, market rent “is the estimated amount for which an
interest in real property should be leased on the valuation date between a willing lessor and a willing lessee” at the same conditions of the market value.
According to IVS 104, equitable value is “the estimated price for the transfer of an asset or liability between identified knowledgeable and willing parties
that reflects the respective interests of those parties”. The value in this case
reflects the respective advantages or disadvantages that each part will gain
from the transaction. This value is different from market value, which excludes
any advantage that is not accessible to all the parties.


M. Fazzini

According to IVS 104, investment value is “the value of an asset to a particular owner or prospective owner for individual investment or operational
objectives”. The value of an investment is linked both to the characteristics of
the asset being valued and to those of the buyer and the seller. It may consider
specific synergies or whether there are any advantages for a specific party.
According to IVS 104, synergistic value is “the result of a combination of
two or more assets or interests where the combined value is more than the
sum of the separate values”. In this book we mainly look at stand-alone valuations, that is, those that are independent of potential synergies. Synergistic
value is often associated with the evaluations made by a potential buyer who
estimates not only the value of the asset but also the contribution that an asset
may bring to the other assets already held. It is therefore an internal evaluation
that can only be appreciated by those who can determine the benefit from
combining several assets together.
According to IVS 104, liquidation value is “the amount that would be
realised when an asset or group of assets are sold on a piecemeal basis”. A business can be liquidated as a natural or forced process. A business would be
“naturally” liquidated when it reaches the end of its life cycle and this condition is accepted by its shareholders. Forced liquidation occurs when the seller
is forced to sell, which places the seller in a weak position with an obvious
adverse impact on value.

1.3.3 Objective and Subjective Component of Value
Given these definitions, we can conclude that there are two dimensions of
value: an objective dimension, which reflects the value of the asset per se, that
is, the intrinsic value that is assigned to an asset in an efficient market, and a
subjective dimension, linked to the characteristics of the parties to the transaction, each of whom seeks to maximize their own benefits.
In general, each valuation contains both an objective and a subjective element. A valuer should stick to the objective dimension as closely as possible,
by making use of the generally accepted methods. Inevitably, however, the
subjective element that is linked to our own perception and experience also
plays a role in the valuation process; such element, however, should be nothing but a background noise that does not affect the stand-alone perspective.
The more the valuer can count on a complete set of information, the less is
the risk associated with the subjective variable.
When asked to make a valuation based on limited information, valuers will
tend to fill the information gap using their own experience and making analogies

  Value, Valuation, and Valuer 


with similar cases they may have dealt with in the past. A valuer should therefore
point out any lack of information, especially if it can influence the choice of the
valuation method and the processing of data.

1.4 Valuation Methods at a Glance
Various business valuation methods have been developed over the years. Each
of these reflects a very precise logic and no one method is better than another
in absolute terms. Rather, there are methods that, in certain circumstances,
are more appropriate than others in interpreting the value of a business.
According to valuation standards, the various methods can be grouped in
three main areas: cost-based approach, income-based approach, and market-­
based approach.
If we compare them based on the assumption that evaluating a company is
not so different from evaluating a used car, we can better understand the logic
of these approaches: there is no single metric to establish a fair value, but
multiple perspectives that we need to consider.
When you go to a dealer, you will first check the car and see if there are any
scratches or dents on the bodywork, check the tire wear, the brake and engine
operation, and any optional features such as air conditioning, safety devices,
sunroof, and so on. In short, you will examine the car “as is”, adjusting the
price accordingly.
Not unlike a car, a firm can have its “scratches on the bodywork”, which
can reduce its book value, such as receivables that are difficult to recover,
obsolete equipment, contingent liabilities, and so on; at the same time, there
may be enhancing elements, such as trademarks and goodwill that give the
firm a competitive advantage, although they are not necessarily recorded in
the financial statement.
As for a car, it is possible to estimate the value of a firm “as is”, based on a
reasoned examination of its assets and liabilities. To do this, we must examine
the items in the financial statements and check whether their book value
reflects their fair value; in case of discrepancies, if the book value is lower than
the fair value, we should make an upward adjustment, and, vice versa, if the
book value is higher than the fair value, a downward adjustment. The valuation method in question is known as cost-based method.
Going back to the car example, we cannot simply look at its current condition; we must also consider expectations on its future use: purchasing a five-­
year-­old car with 200,000 miles is quite different from purchasing a car of
similar age, but with 20,000 miles. In the first case, the car certainly has a


M. Fazzini

shorter residual life and we will likely face higher maintenance costs; in the
second case, the car is relatively new and will presumably require less expensive maintenance. The expected benefit, that is, what is expected from the
vehicle taking into account its intrinsic characteristics, is therefore anything
but secondary. If we apply this reasoning to businesses, we can determine the
value of a business based on future expectations, that is, based on the results it
could potentially achieve. This valuation method in question is known as
income-based method.
Finally, we can determine the value of the car by comparing the price proposed by the dealer with the values found in magazines and specialized websites, to make sure that the requested price falls within a range of plausible
amounts, taking into account the characteristics of the car such as age, wear
and tear, optional features, and so on. A company can likewise be evaluated
based on a comparison with comparable entities. This valuation method in question is known as market-based method.
When we buy a used car, many valuation methods should be applied.
Looking at the conditions of the car does not exclude an estimate of its future
use nor a comparison with the prices published on specialized websites and
magazines. Indeed, it is precisely through several approaches that we can assess
if the price of a car is fair.
When valuing a business, on the other hand, we must choose a specific
method. In fact, depending on the method, the results may be very different
from one another. How is it possible? First, a business is more complex than a
car, which is obvious. Second, the approaches refer to different parameters:
• the cost-based method looks at the present and evaluates a business “as is”;
• the income-based method looks at the future and evaluates a business based
on “what it will do”;
• the market-based method is based on the value of similar companies or
transactions involving comparable companies; in practice, it evaluates a
business based on “what others do”.
When using more methods, the results obtained may be similar, but this is
not a foregone conclusion. Each method is based on different logics and
parameters and the value of the same business may differ due to the different
perspective inherent in each method.
Sometimes a combination of a main method and a control method can be
used, to base the valuation on an increased number of variables. If the two
methods correctly interpret the value of the business, the result can be similar;
otherwise the values may differ significantly.

  Value, Valuation, and Valuer 


1.5 Types of Valuation
There are different types of valuation according to the purpose of the assignment. Specifically, the following types can be identified:

third-party valuation;
in-house valuation;
valuation opinion;
fairness opinion;
calculation engagement;
valuation review.

A valuation performed for a third party is a document containing an opinion
on the value of a business that is obtained through an independent and complex valuation process. In this case, valuers rely on the information gathered
and on their personal experience, in order to carry out a comprehensive valuation, in accordance with the purpose of the assignment. If the valuation is
commissioned by a seller, it is a sell-side valuation; if it is commissioned by a
buyer, it is a buy-side valuation.
The purpose of the work can partially influence the choice of method and
the final assessed value. For example, in a sell-side valuation, the valuer may
have access to internal documents, such as a business plan, which may point
toward a DCF (discounted cash flow) method. On the other hand, a buy-side
valuer could tend to use multiple methods, given the absence of internal
There may be various reasons for making an in-house valuation, such as
assessing whether selling the business, in whole or in part, is a good deal, or to
test a subsidiary company for impairment. The technicalities used are the
same as those of the valuation performed for a third party and internal information may obviously be used.
The valuation opinion, also called expert opinion or expert report, consists
in an assessment process limited to some aspects or based on unverified inputs
provided by the client. It may concern, for example, determining a discount
rate to be applied to the cash flows provided by the client and not reviewed;
updating some parameters of a previous valuation; determining value based
on a limited information base; and so on. This group includes equity research
carried out by external analysts.
A fairness opinion consists in verifying the reliability of a valuation process
carried out by another party, given the inputs used, the method applied, and
the conclusions reached. The aim of this opinion is to assess how reasonable a
third-party valuation or a valuation opinion is.


M. Fazzini

A calculation engagement is not a real valuation, but a check of specific
inputs used by another party. For example, this opinion may concern the
development of a peer group to be used in the multiples method, or the analysis of the coefficients contained in the weighted average cost of capital
(WACC) formula.
Finally, the valuation review consists of a critical analysis of the work carried
out by another valuer, to verify its correctness or to update it. Sometimes a
valuation review involves a second opinion by an expert valuer, to verify the
results; in other cases, it is a review carried out months or years after the valuation was made, with the aim of verifying whether the data or conclusions are
still valid or whether they need an updating.

1.6 Who Is the Valuer
According to the International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC), a valuer
is “an individual, group of individuals or a firm who possesses the necessary
qualifications, ability and experience to execute a valuation in an objective,
unbiased and competent manner”.
As mentioned, a valuation arises from a reasoned opinion based on estimates and is never the mere application of a mathematical calculation.
Therefore, an expert should not just be able to “apply the formulas”, but also
satisfy a broader set of requirements, including:
1 . respect for professional ethics;
2. independence;
3. objectivity in researching and selecting information;
4. expertise and diligence in carrying out the assignment.
The respect for professional ethics involves complying with a series of requirements, such as those contained in the “Code of Ethical Principles for
Professional Valuers” issued by the IVSC.
According to the IVSC, a professional valuer is expected to comply with
the following ethical principles:
(a) integrity: to be straightforward and honest in professional and business
(b) objectivity: not to allow conflict of interest, or undue influence or bias to
override professional or business judgment.

Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay