xác định hàm lượng asen trong nước ngầm bằng phương pháp lò graphite (bằng tiếng anh)
Acknowledgment To my supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nguyen Van Ri and Master. Nguyen Tien Duc in Department of Analysis Chemistry. I express great appreciation for your time, support patience and guidance throughout this study your continuous enthusiasm and knowledge of the topic relating to this project were an inspiration to me. Also I am thankful to all my classmates for being great friends and helping me so much
March, 29 th , 2012 Doan Thi Bich Ngoc 1 Table of Contents Abstract (English) Pollution of arsenic is an acute problem not only in Vietnam but also in worldwide. It is estimated about 57 million people are using surface 2 water with the arsenic concentration is higher than the World
Health Organization standard of 10 mg / l (ppb). Arsenic in groundwater is of natural origin and it is released from the sediments due to the anoxic conditions or from the weathered and runoff ores containing arsenic. Arsenic is a poisonous compound that can cause some diseases such as lung cancer, skin cancer, bladder cancer and respiratory diseases. For this reason, there are many studies to find out the useful method to reduce arsenic concentrations in water. In this report, I used the method of atomic absorption spectrometry with graphite furnace to determine the arsenic levels in water and study the use of laterite material to absorb arsenic from water. GF-AAS method is highly sensitive method that can determine the total arsenic in water with high repeatability and detection limits can be achieved ppb levels. Using treated laterite as the adsorbent, water quality is greatly improved, and arsenic can be reduced by 90%, in addition with the low cost and wide applicability. 3 Abstract (Vietnamese) Ô nhiễm asen là một vấn đề vô cùng nhức nhối không chỉ ở Việt Nam mà trên toàn thế giới. Người ta ước tính khoảng 57 triệu người đang sử dụng nguồn nước mặt có hàm lượng asen cao hơn tiêu chuẩn của Tổ chức Y tế Thế giới là 10 μg/l (ppb). Asen trong nước mặt có nguồn gốc tự nhiên và nó được giải phóng ra từ trầm tích do các điều kiện thiếu ôxy hoặc từ các quặng chứa asen bị phong hóa và rửa trôi. Asen là chất độc có thể gây ra một số loại bệnh như: ung thư phổi, ung thư da, ung thư bang quang và các bệnh về hô hấp. Vì lý do đó mà rất nhiều công trình nghiên cứu nhằm tìm ra các phương pháp hữu ích để làm giảm nồng độ asen trong nước. Trong bài báo cáo này, tôi đã sử dụng phương pháp quang phổ hấp thụ nguyên tử với lò graphite để xác định hàm lượng asen trong nước và nghiên cứu sử dụng đá ong để làm vật liệu hấp thụ asen có trong nước. Phương pháp GF-AAS là phương pháp có độ nhạy cao, có thể xác định được tổng hàm lượng asen có trong nước với độ lặp lại cao và giới hạn phát hiện có thể đạt hàm lượng ppb. Sử dụng đá ong có xử lý làm vật liệu hấp phụ, chất lượng nước được cải thiện rất nhiều, hàm lượng asen có thể giảm đến 90%, hơn nữa giá thành rẻ và khả năng ứng dụng rộng rãi. 4 Introduction In history, arsenic in science, medicine and technology has been overshadowed by its notoriety as a poison in homicides. Arsenic is viewed as being synonymous with toxicity. Dangerous arsenic concentrations in natural waters are now a worldwide problem. High arsenic concentrations have been
reported recently from the USA, China, Chile, Bangladesh, Taiwan, Mexico, Argentina, Poland, Canada, Hungary, Japan and India. Among them the largest population at risk is in Bangladesh followed by West Bengal in India. Twenty one countries in different parts of the word, groundwater contains arsenic. Many countries in the world are carrying on investigation on arsenic. Historically, colorimetric and gravimetric methods have been used for determination of arsenic. In recent years, atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) has become the method of choices. However a commonly used technique for the measurement of arsenic is the highly sensitive hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometric method. After examine arsenic, if arsenic is over legal limit in water, those countries must remove arsenic. There are traditionally technologies to remove arsenic from water (oxidation, precipitation/coagulation/membrane separation) with far less attention paid to adsorption. The sorption capacities of both available and developed sorbents used for arsenic remediation together with the traditional remediation methods. We have incorporated most of the valuable available literature on arsenic remediation by adsorption. Existing purification methods for drinking water; wastewater; industrial effluents, and technological solutions for arsenic have been listed. Arsenic sorption by commercially available carbons and other low-cost adsorbents are surveyed and critically reviewed and their option efficiencies are compared. Some commercially available absorbents are also surveyed. An extensive table summarizes the sorption capacities of various adsorbents. Some low-cost adsorbents are superior including treated slag, carbons developed from agricultural waste (char carbons and coconut husk carbons), biosorbents (immobilized biomass, orange juice residue), goethite and some commercial adsorbents, which include resins, gels, silica, treated silica tested for arsenic removal come out to be superior. Desorption 5 of arsenic followed by regeneration of sorbents has been discussed. Strong acids and bases seem to be the best desorbing agents to produce arsenic concentrates. Arsenic concentrate treatment and disposal obtained is briefly addressed. This issue is very important but much less discussed. A: Overview of arsenic Chapter 1: Introducing arsenic 1.1 Properties of arsenic 1.1.1 Identity Elemental arsenic (As) is a member of Group 15 of the periodic table, with nitrogen, phosphorus, antimony and bismuth. It has an atomic number of 33 and an atomic mass of 74.91. Arsenic is ubiquitous and ranks 20th in natural abundance, comprising about 0.00005% of the earth’s crust, 14th in the seawater, and 12th in the human body. It’s concentration in most rocks ranges from 0.5 to 2.5 mg/kg, though higher concentrations are found in finer grained argillaceous sediments and phosphorites. It is a silver-grey brittle crystalline solid, specific gravity 5.73, melting point 817 o C (at 28 atm), boiling point 613 o C and vapor pressure 1mm Hg at 372 o C 1.1.2 Chemical and physical properties of arsenic compounds Arsenic is a metalloid widely distributed in the earth’s crust. It can exist in four valency states; –3, 0, +3, and +5. In strongly reducing environments, elemental arsenic and arsine (–3) can exist. Under moderately reducing conditions, arsenite (+3) may be the dominant form, but arsenate (+5) is generally the stable oxidation state in oxygenated environments. Environmental forms include arsenious acids (H 3 AsO 3 , H 3 AsO 3 , H 3 AsO 3 2- ), arsenic acids (H 3 AsO 4 , H 3 AsO 4 - , H 3 AsO 4 2- ), arsenites, arsenates, methyl arsenic acid, dimethylarsinic acid, arsine, etc. Arsenic (III) is a hard acid and preferentially complexes with oxides and nitrogen. Conversely, arsenic (V) behaves like a soft acid, forming complexes with sulfides. 6 Inorganic forms of arsenic most often exist in water supplies. Arsenic is uniquely sensitive to mobilization (pH 6.5–8.5) and under both oxidizing and reducing conditions among heavy metalloids. Two forms are common in natural waters: arsenite (AsO 3 3- ) and arsenate (AsO 4 3- ), referred to as arsenic (III) and arsenic (V). Pentavalent (+5) or arsenate species are AsO 4 3- , HAsO 4 2 -, H 2 AsO 4 -while trivalent (+3) arsenates include As(OH) 3 , As(OH) 4 - , AsO 2 OH 2 - and AsO 3 3- . 1.2 Arsenic and water Arsenic can be found in seawater (2-4 ppb), and in rivers (0.5-2 ppb). Half of the arsenic present is bound to particles. Freshwater and seas algae contain about 1-250 ppm of arsenic, freshwater hydrophytes contain 2-1450 ppm, marine mollusks contain 1-70 ppm, marine crustaceans 0.5-69 ppm, and fishes 0.2-320 ppm (all values are based on dry mass). In some marine organisms, such as algae and shrimp, arsenic can be found in organic compounds. The legal limit for arsenic in water applied by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 10 µg/L. 1.2.1 Arsenic react with water Elementary arsenic normally does not react with water in absence of air. It does not react with dry air, but when it comes in contact with moist air a layer is formed. The layer has a bronze color, and later develops a black surface. An example of an arsenic compounds that reacts strongly with water is orpiment. This is an amorphous arsenic compound. Reaction mechanism: As 2 S 3 + 6 H 2 O → 2 H 3 AsO 3 + 3 H 2 S In natural water arsenic participates in oxidation and reduction reactions, coagulation and adsorption. Adsorption of arsenic to fine particles in water and precipitation with aluminum or iron hydroxides causes arsenic to enter sediments. 1.2.2 Arsenic present in water Metallic arsenic is processed in lead or copper alloys, to increase hardness. The extremely toxic arsenic gas ASH 3 plays an important role in microchip production. Copper arsenate (Cu 3 (AsO 4 ) 2 .4H 2 O) is applied as a pesticide in viticulture, but its use is currently prohibited in many countries. Paxite (CuAs 2 ) is an insecticide and fungicide. 7 1.3 Effect of arsenic 1.3.1 The environmental effects of arsenic in water Arsenic is an essential compound for many animal species, because it plays a role in protein synthesis. It is unclear whether arsenic is a dietary mineral for humans. Arsenic toxicity is another important characteristic. The boundary concentration of arsenic is 2-46 ppm for freshwater algae. Plants absorb arsenic fairly easily, so that high-ranking concentrations may be present in food. The concentrations of the dangerous inorganic arsenics that are currently present in surface waters enhance the chances of alteration of genetic materials of fish. 1.3.2 The health effects of arsenic in water Arsenic related illness is usually caused by consumption of contaminated drinking water. In the old days it was applied as a poison, because symptoms of arsenic poisoning resemble cholera symptoms, and therefore the intentional factor was shaded. Arsenic in drinking water is an issue of global importance; therefore the legal limit was decreased to 10μg /L. This legal limit is not met in countries such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, where millions of people consume drinking water with an arsenic content of over 50μg /L. This problem results in long- term chronic health effects, such as skin disease, skin cancer, and tumors in lungs, bladder, kidneys and liver. 1.3.3 Arsenic contamination of water in the world Arsenic in natural waters is a worldwide problem. Arsenic pollution has been reported recently in the USA, China, Bangladesh, Taiwan, Mexico, Argentina, Poland, Canada, Hungary, New Zealand, Japan, and India. The largest population with known groundwater arsenic contamination is in Bangladesh, followed by West Bengal in India. Larger regions in the USA are affected. Vulnerable areas in Nepal, Pakistan, Thai-land, Laos, Cambodia, and Sumatra have barely or not been examined so far. Many other countries and districts in South East Asia, such as Vietnam, Cambodia, and China have geological environments conducive to generation of high-arsenic groundwater. 8 18.104.22.168 At Bangladesh and West Bengal According to the World Health Organization, “In Bangladesh, West Bengal (India) and some other areas, most drinking-water used to be collected from open dug wells and ponds with little or no arsenic, but with contaminated water transmitting diseases such as diarrhea, dysentery, typhoid, cholera and hepatitis. Programmes to provide ‘safe’ drinking-water over the past 30 years have helped to control these diseases, but in some areas they have had the unexpected side-effect of exposing the population to another health problem—arsenic.” The acceptable level as defined by WHO for maximum concentrations of arsenic in safe drinking water is 0.01 mg/L. The Bangladesh government's standard is at a slightly higher rate, at 0.05 mg/L being considered safe. WHO has defined the areas under threat: Seven of the nineteen districts of West Bengal have been reported to have ground water arsenic concentrations above 0.05 mg/L. The total population in these seven districts is over 34 million, with the number using arsenic-rich water is more than 1 million (above 0.05 mg/L). That number increases to 1.3 million when the concentration is above 0.01 mg/L. According to a British Geological Survey study in 1998 on shallow tube-wells in 61 of the 64 districts in Bangladesh, 46% of the samples were above 0.01 mg/L and 27% were above 0.050 mg/L. When combined with the estimated 1999 population, it was estimated that the number of people exposed to arsenic concentrations above 0.05 mg/L is 28-35 million and the number of those exposed to more than 0.01 mg/L is 46-57 million.  22.214.171.124 United States There are many locations across the United States where the groundwater contains naturally high concentrations of arsenic. Cases of groundwater-caused acute arsenic toxicity, such as those found in Bangladesh, are unknown in the United States where the concern has focused on the role of arsenic as a carcinogen Some locations in the United States, such as Fallon, Nevada, have long been known to have groundwater with relatively high arsenic concentrations (in excess of 0.08 mg/L). Even some surface waters, such as the Verde River in Arizona, sometimes exceed 0.01 mg/L arsenic, especially during low-flow periods when the river flow is dominated by groundwater discharge.  9 1.3.4 Arsenic contamination of water in Vietnam Arsenic contamination of water has become a crucial water quality problem in many part of the world. The contamination of groundwater by arsenic in Bangladesh is the largest poisoning of a population in history. At Vietnam the Vietnamese capital of Hanoi is situated at the upper end of the 11 000 km2 Red River Delta of northern Vietnam, which is inhabited by 11 million people and is one of the most populous areas in the world. Together with the Mekong Delta, the Red River Delta (Bac Bo Plain) has become one of the most productive agricultural regions of Southeast Asia. The rural population is growing rapidly and has, in the last 5-7 yr, moved away from using surface water or water from shallow dug wells as sources for drinking water in favor of groundwater pumped from individual private (family based) tube wells. Groundwater exploitation in the city of Hanoi began 90 yr ago. Today, eight major well fields supply water to city treatment facilities, which process 500 000m3 of water per day. [4-6] The results of the measuring campaign of September 1999 in the rural districts. The results from the investigated family-based tube wells reveal that 50% of the samples exceed the Vietnamese guideline value of 50 µg arsenic per liter with an average concentration of all the samples amounting to 159 µg /l. Peak values of 3000 µg arsenic per liter, south of Hanoi. The situation in a district (peak value of arsenic in water) is particularly alarming: with an average value of 432 µg /l, 90% of the analyzed samples revealed concentrations of 51– 3000 µg /l. 10 Chapter 2: Analytical arsenic Historically, colorimetric and gravimetric methods have been used for the determination of arsenic. However, these methods are either semi- quantitative or lack sensitivity. In recent years, atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) has become the method of choice, as it offers the possibility of selectivity and sensitivity in the detection of a wide range of metals and non-metals including arsenic. Popular methods for generating atoms for AAS are flame and electrothermally heated graphite furnaces. However, a commonly used technique for the measurement of arsenic is the highly sensitive hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometric method (HGAAS). However, although it is suitable for total arsenic determination after appropriate digestion the technique is only routinely used to speciate a limited number of compounds – arsenite, arsenate, MMA, DMA, trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO). 2.1 Sample preparation and treatment 2.1.1 Sampling and collection Care must be taken to avoid contamination and prevent speciation changes during sample collection and storage. Plastic containers should be acid washed and traces of oxidizing and reducing agents avoided to preserve the oxidation state of arsenic compounds 2.1.2 Oxidative digestion Acid digestion and dry ashing are the two basic methods which have been widely employed for oxidative digestion of samples before analysis. In more recent years, microwave-assisted digestion has been used. For analysis of biological soft tissues by ICP techniques, a simple partial digestion in a closed vessel at low temperature and pressure is often sufficient for the sample preparation and pretreatment step. 2.1.3 Extraction For speciation of arsenic, solvent extraction is often required before analysis. For example, arsenite and arsenate in soil can be speciated after a hydrochloric acid and chloroform extraction procedure. Water has been used 11 for the extraction of soluble arsenic compounds from soil with the aid of ultrasonic treatment 2.1.4 Supercritical fluid extraction There are very few publications on the use of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) for the determination of arsenic. Wenclawiak & Krah (1995) reported a procedure for the measurement of arsenic species using SFE followed by GC or SFC detection. 2.2 Macro-measurement Most procedures for the separation and determination of arsenic are based on distillation and hydrogen sulfide precipitation methods. Beard & Lyerly (1961) reported a gravimetric method for the measurement of arsenic following extraction of arsenic as AsCl 3 by benzene in strong hydrochloric acid. The recovery was close to 100% when 20 mg was spiked into an aqueous solution. 2.3 Colorimetric methods George et al. (1973) carried out a collaborative study for a colorimetric measurement of arsenic in poultry and swine tissues using silver diethyldithiocarbamate (AgDDTC) as the complexion agent. The sensitivity was 0.1 mg/kg in tissues. Dhar et al. (1997) reported a detection limit of 0.04 mg/liter with 95% confidence limit using AgDDTC in chloroform with hexamethylenetetramine. 2.4 Methods for total inorganic arsenic Methods for the analysis of inorganic arsenic based on its conversion to arsenic trichloride or arsenic tribromide by treatment with 6 mol/liter hydrochloric acid or hydrobromic acid have been described. The arsenic trihalide is separated from the remaining organic arsenic either by distillation (Maher, 1983) or by solvent extraction (Brooke & Evans, 1981). The methods have been applied routinely to the measurement of inorganic arsenic in a variety of foodstuffs, including those of marine origin where any inorganic arsenic is a small percentage of the total arsenic present 12 2.5 Atomic spectrometry Common flame atomic absorption spectrometric methods are flame AAS (FAAS), electrothermal AAS (ETAAS) and hydride generation AAS (HGAAS). FAAS is relatively less sensitive for the determination of arsenic than ETAAS and HGAAS. Its detection limit is usually in the range of sub- milligram quantities per liter, and therefore it has limited application, especially for biological samples. HGAAS is probably the most widely used method for the determination of arsenic in various matrices. Most of the reported errors in the determination of arsenic by HGAAS with NaBH 4 can be attributed to variation in the production of the hydride and its transport into the atomizer. The reaction and atomization of arsine have been reviewed and discussed by Welz et al. (1990). The addition of a solution of l-cysteine to a sample before hydride generation eliminates interference by a number of transition metals in the generation of arsine from arsenite and arsenate, and improves responses of arsine generated from MMA and DMA in the presence of arsenite and arsenate. Atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) has recently been used for the detection of arsenic hydrides in the ultraviolet spectral region because of the small background emission produced by the relatively cool hydrogen diffusion flame. The use of cold vapor or hydride generation, together with intense light sources, allows very low detection limits to be achieved. For example, arsenic species in seawater have been measured using hydride generation and cold trapping, coupled with AFS detection at 193.7 nm. They found detection limits of 2.3, 0.9, 2.4 and 3.7 ng/liter for arsenite, arsenate, MMA and DMA respectively (in a 5 ml sample), with a precision of 3.5%. 2.6 ICP methodologies ICP-MS is more susceptible to isobaric interferences arising from the plasma. For example, hydrochloric acid and perchloric acid are not desirable for sample preparation, because the chloride ions generated in the plasma combine with the argon gas to form argon chloride (ArCl). This has the same mass as arsenic (75) which could lead to error if not corrected. Therefore, whenever possible, only nitric acid should be used in sample preparation. 13 2.7 Voltammetry Voltammetric stripping methods are mostly based on the chemical reduction of As (V) to As (III) before the deposition step, because it has been generally assumed that As (V) is electrochemically inactive. Mercury and gold (or gold-plated) electrodes are most commonly used for the determination of arsenic. 2.8 X-ray spectroscopy Particle-induced X-ray emission spectrometry (PIXES) is an analytical technique that entails the bombardment of a sample (target) with charged particles, resulting in the emission of characteristic X-rays of the elements present. PIXES is a multi-elemental technique with a detection limit of approximately 0.1 μg As/g. It has the advantage of using small samples (1 mg or less) and being a non-destructive technique. 14 Chapter 3: Arsenic remediation There are several methods available for removal of arsenic from water in large conventional treatment plants. The most commonly used technologies include oxidation, co-precipitation and adsorption onto coagulated flocs, lime treatment, adsorption onto sorptive media, ion exchange resin and membrane techniques. A detailed review of arsenic removal technologies is presented by Sorg and Logsdon (1978). Jackel (1994) has documented several advances in arsenic removal technologies. In view of the lowering the drinking water standards by USEPA, a review of arsenic removal technologies was made to consider the economic factors involved in implementing lower drinking water standards for arsenic. Many of the arsenic removal technologies have been discussed in details in AWWA reference book. A comprehensive review of low-cost, well-water treatment technologies for arsenic removal with the list of companies and organizations involved in arsenic removal technologies has been compiled by Murcott (2000) with contact detail.
15 [9-10] 16 3.1 Co-precipitation and adsorption processes Water treatment with coagulants such as aluminum alum, Al 2 (SO 4 ) 3 .18H 2 O, ferric chloride , FeCl 3 and ferric sulfate Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 .7H 2 O are effective in removing arsenic from water. Ferric salts have been found to be more effective in removing arsenic than alum on a weight basis and effective over a wider range of pH. In both cases pentavalent arsenic can be more effectively removed than trivalent arsenic. In the coagulation-flocculation process aluminum sulfate, or ferric chloride, or ferric sulfate is added and dissolved in water under efficient stirring for one to few minutes. Aluminium or ferric hydroxide micro-flocs are formed rapidly. The water is then gently stirred for few minutes for agglomeration of micro-flocs into larger easily settable flocs. During this flocculation process all kinds of microparticles and negatively charged ions are attached to the flocs by electrostatic attachment. Arsenic is also adsorbed onto coagualted flocs. As trivalent arsenic occurs in non-ionized form, it is not subject to significant removal. Oxidation of As(III) to As(V) is thus required as a pretreatment for efficient removal. This can be achieved by addition of bleaching powder (chlorine) or potassium permanganate as shown in Equations 2 and 3. The possible chemical equations of alum coagulation are as follows: Alum dissolution: Al 2 (SO4) 3 .18H2O = 2Al 3+ + 3SO4 2- + 18H 2 O (1) Aluminium precipitation(acidic): 2Al 3+ + 6H 2 O = 2Al(OH) 3 + 6H + (2) Co-precipitation (Non-stoichiometric, non-defined product): H 2 AsO 4 - + Al(OH) 3 = Al-As (complex) + Other Products (3) Arsenic adsorbed on aluminiun hydroxide focs as Al-As complex is removed by sedimentation. Filtration may be required to ensure complete removal of all flocs. Similar reactions take place in case of ferric chloride and ferric sulfate with the formation of Fe-As complex as end product which is removed by the process of sedimentation and filtration. The possible reactions of arsenate with hydrous iron oxide are shown below where [≡FeOH o ] represents oxide surface site Fe(OH) 3 (s) + H 3 AsO 4 → FeAsO 4 .2H 2 O + H 2 O (4) ≡FeOH o + AsO 4 3- + 3 H + → ≡FeH 2 AsO 4 + H 2 O (5) 17 ≡FeOH o + AsO 4 3- + 2 H + → ≡FeHAsO 4 - + H 2 O (6) The immobilization of arsenic by hydrous iron oxide, as shown in Eqs. 4 to 6, requires oxidation of arsenic species into As(V) form for higher efficiency. Arsenic removal is dependent on pH. In alum coagulation, the removal is most effective in the pH range 7.2-7.5 and in iron coagulation, efficient removal is achieved in a wider pH range usually between 6.0 and 8.5 . 3.2 Arsenic removal by adsorption onto Fe hydroxide and oxidation by hypochlorite. The use of naturally occurring iron precipitates in ground water in Bangladesh is a promising method of removing arsenic by adsorption. It has been found that hand tubewell water in 65% of the area in Bangladesh contains iron in excess of 2 mg/L and in many acute iron problem areas, the concentration of dissolved iron is higher than 15 mg/L. Although no good correlation between concentrations of iron and arsenic has been derived, iron and arsenic have been found to co-exist in ground water. Most of the tubewell water samples satisfying Bangladesh Drinking Water Standard for Iron ( 1 mg/L) also satisfy the standard for Arsenic (50 mg/L). Only about 50% of the samples having iron content 1 - 5 mg/L satisfy the standard for arsenic while 75% of the samples having iron content > 5 mg/L are unsafe for having high concentration of arsenic. The iron precipitates [Fe(OH) 3 ] formed by oxidation of dissolved iron [Fe(OH) 2 ] present in groundwater, as discussed above, have the affinity for the adsorption of arsenic. The Fe-As removal relationship with good correlation in some operating IRPs has been plotted in Figure 4. Results show that most IRPs can lower arsenic content of tubewell water to half to one-fifth of the original concentrations. The efficiency of these community type Fe-As removal plant can be increased by increasing the contact time between arsenic species and iron flocs. Community participation in operation and maintenance in the local level is absolutely essential for effective use of these plants. 18 B: Experimental Results Chapter 1: Determination of arsenic content in natural water by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) is an easy, rapid method and has been widely used for the determination of trace elements in natural water. However, it has not been used for direct determination of As because of poor sensitivity. The sensitivity is greatly enhanced by coupling a hydride generation method with ﬂame  and ﬂameless  atomic absorption spectrometry. Walcerz et al.  and Sturgeon and Gregoire  reported unique preconcentration methods. That is, generated hydrides were transferred to the inner wall of the graphite furnace, then the furnace was heated at a high temperature, vaporized As was determined by AAS  and ICP-MS . However, the hydride generation method has a tendency to interference by coexisting ions  1 Reagents and apparatus 1.1 Reagents - Axid: HCl PA-Merck 36% HNO 3 PA-Merck 65% H 2 SO 4 PA-Merck - The solutions of chemical modified Pd(NO 3 ) 2 Merck 10.000ppm Mg(NO 3 ) 2 Merck 1000ppm Ni(NO 3 ) 2 Merck 1000ppm - Twice distilled water - Standard solution As 1000ppm for AAS, Merck 1.2 Apparatus • Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) 1. Device Name: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) 2. Marking: AA - 6800 19 3. Manufacturer: Shimazdu - Japan 4. Panorama photo equipment 5. The main technical parameters 5.1. AA-6800F Main Unit +The body can pair the more other systems + Includes: monochromatic radiation sources, Division of samples, optical systems and electronic systems, unit measure signaling interfacing with computer controlled Wizard software + Being able to switch automatically measuring techniques to measure furnace flame and graphite 5.2. The system is GFA-EX7 graphite + Furnace system, the power supply line, accompanied by accessories: cuvette graphite, graphite electrodes, 5.3. Automatic samplers ASC-6100 + Can be used to increase automation for all measurement techniques: flame, furnace measurements, measuring hydride, measurement of cold air + Can not use that measure by hand. 5.4. Ministry of HVG hydride -1 + Includes main unit, quartz cuvette, mixer, loop response, the separation of liquid and air nozzle connected to form the ASC-6100 + To measure the ability to create the element hydrides: As, Se, Hg, 5.5. Ministry of cold MVU-1A + Includes main unit, reactor, the stirring words, the circulating gas and sealed cuvette. + Hg measured with high sensitivity of 0.1 ppb 5.6. Gas supply system + Clean air compressor OF-25B + The system gas: C 2 H 2, N 2 O, Ar. 5.7.Bo hollow cathode lamps (HCL) and add the D 2 lamp: + Includes 10 lights HCL: Cd, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn, Ca, Mg + Lights add the background spectrum measured D 2 5.8. Working conditions of the system: Voltage: Single Phase (220 ± 10%). Particularly the MVU-1A must use 100V voltage Temperature: 20 -25 o C. Humidity: Maintain 80%. + Cooling water to furnace: Temperatures below 55 o C. 6. Operating principle 20 Theoretical basis of the AAS measurement is the absorption of energy (monochromatic radiation) of free atoms in a state of steam (gas) when the projection beam of radiation through the vapor cloud elements in the environment that absorbed . So you want to do is measure the atomic absorption spectrum should have the following processes: + choose a type conditions and appropriate equipment to transfer samples for analysis from the initial state (solid or liquid) into a vapor state of free atoms. It is the process of sample atoms. The equipment to perform this process called chemical model of atomic systems. + Screening of a light beam emitted by the element to be analyzed through atomic vapor cloud has been prepared above. The atoms of the element to determine the vapor cloud would absorb the radiation and produce certain of its absorption spectrum. Here, a beam intensity of a light had been absorbed by atoms and depends on the concentration of elements in the environment to absorb. Source emitting a light beam to determine the elements called monochromatic radiation source. AAS 6800 + atoms can form chemical flame or no flame (using graphite furnace) has very high sensitivity when to fold hundreds of thousands of times in the flame measurements should be able to identify the elements traces with very small concentrations. 7. The parameters of the model that the device can be measured: Concentrations of heavy metals such as (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Hg, As, B, Cr, Al, Fe, Ni, ) the alkali and alkaline earth metals (Ca, Mg, K, Na ) have environmental components in soil, water, air, fertilizer and agricultural products. 9. Basic requirements for sample: Most of all in solid form (to be destroyed by the microwave), liquid, gas (to be absorbed in the solution and then measuring machine) * Electric flask heater 250ml * Volumetric flask 10ml, 25ml, 50ml, 100ml, 250ml * Pipette 1ml, 2ml, 5ml, 10ml…… micropipette 20-5000µl 21 Test condition HCL light (mA) 10 (70% I Max ) Measure bar (nm) 309,30 Slot meter (nm) 0,5 Height measurement (mm) 6-7 Environment gas (mL/ph) Ar Type of cuvet A Environment of sample solution HNO 3 2% Background sample (Modify) 0,05 mg/ml Mg(NO 3 ) 2
Loading of sample ( µL) 10 Sensitivity LOD (ppb) 0,5 Linear region(ppb) 2 – 30 Atomization program T( o C) t(s) T Ram (s) Ar(ml/ph) 1: Dry 120/250 30 30 500-400 2: Cineration 600/700 30 15 800-1000 3:Atomization spectrometry 2550/2600 3 0 30 4: Clean cuvet 2700 2 0 1000 Analysis of spectral lines 22 No Spectral line (nm) LOD (ppb) LOQ (ppb) C Max (ppb) 1 As-193,70 0.2 2 20 2 Survey the conditions of spectrometry. To study a good result, the study selected parameters measured in accordance with a quantitative analysis of chemical elements is a work essential and important in AAS techniques. Preliminary survey we chose the following conditions to conduct optimal machine parameters: - Solution As: 50ppb in HNO 3 0.5%, modified Pd(NO 3 ) 2 0.03% - Volume of each pumping: 20μl - Measuring mode: absorbance ( Abs) 2.1 Select the measurement wavelength Atoms of each element can only absorb the spectrum having characteristic energy, emitted in the emission process. Absorbance spectrum of atoms is line spectrum. With each element have a several lines to the characteristic emission spectra. Therefore, the selected lines which not only makes sense to find a spectrum with highest absorption but also must be compatible with the purposes of research and avoid the crowded spectra of other elements having a wavelength coincides with wavelength of the element to be analyzed. Results of the scientist showed that arsenic has two characteristic lines are 193.7nm and 228.8nm, 228.8nm in wavelength photosynthesis absorption of arsenic is affected by spectral lines of the elements cadmium, photosynthesis absorption is peak at a wavelength of 193.7nm. We therefore choose to measure arsenic at 193.7nm spectral lines. 2.2 Survey intensity hollow cathode lamps Hollow cathode lamps (HCL) is the source of resonance radiation, it emits sensitive radiation beams of metal element is used as the cathode hollow. HCL lamps work in a given regime of the radiation beam will have certain intensity. The intensity working of HCL lamp has related to the intensity 23 absorption of spectral lines. Current working of the lamp of each element HCL is very different. Each lamp HCL has limited the maximum current (I max ) is written in shell lamps. The theoretical and experimental analysis of the atomic absorption spectrum, the intensity should be used only in limited range of 60-85% of maximum intensity lamp. If the maximum used will be very quickly broken lamp, lamp working instability, and sensitivity, repeatability is poor. With the HCL lamp of arsenic have I max = 12mA, we examined the lamp intensity value: 6; 7; 8; 9;10; and 11 mA with 20ppb arsenic solution in HNO 3 solution 0.5%, 0.03% Pd(NO 3 ) 2 . Survey results the lamp intensity given in Table 1. Table 1: Survey intensity hollow cathode lamps I (mA) 6 7 8 9 10 11 Abs 0.0602 0.0596 0.0650 0.0656 0.0657 0.0573 RSD (%) 9.2275 2.9541 4.4135 5.8585 5.5356 1.4523 Graph 1: Survey intensity hollow cathode lamp From the result, we see that at intensity 10mA, the measurement arsenic has a high sensitive and stable. Therefore, the intensity hollow cathode lamps 10mA was chosen in my experiment. 2.3 Survey measured slit width of atomic absorption spectrometer Beam emitted of the element analysis is emitted from the hollow cathode lamp after passing through the environment will be oriented to the slot of monochrome system. This system, the collimated light beam and splits, then only one spectral line to measured direction of the measurement of monochromatic slit. This spectrum affects to photoelectric to generate the signal intensity of absorption lines. Therefore, slit measurements shall be fit for the spectral lines so that the signal is sensitive enough to reach stability and eliminates the crowded spectral lines of other elements on both sides of the research spectrum. For AA-6800 machine, we can choose the slit size is measured: 0.2; 0.5 and 1 nm The survey results come with slit width As 20ppb solution in solution 0.5%, 0.03% Pd(NO 3 ) 2 was showed in table 2 Table 2: Survey measured slit width of atomic absorption spectrometer Slit width (nm) 0.2 0.5 1 Abs 0.0739 0.0606 0.0559 24 RSD (%) 2.7198 8.1696 8.8786 By the results in table 2 we see, slit width is 0.2nm having the absorption spectrum of the largest and high stability. So we select slit width measured is 0.2nm. 2.4 Survey the effects of chemical substances modified Even though technically flameless atomization is sensitivity and precision but the influence of the sample to the absorbance of arsenic is very high, especially in the complex sample. If the sample contains thermal stability compounds, evaporation is difficult, hard atomization it will be difficult for the process of evaporation and atomization elements of the analysis should lead to a decrease in the stability and intensity spectral lines. So to get accurate results we have to find ways to reduce or eliminate the influence of the sample. To do that, one can raise the temperature of atomization and ashing by adding the modified substances into sample. The atomic temperature rising has only a certain limit, so the addition of chemical substances into the modified sample is widely used for many different object sample. There are 2 groups modified substance: - Group 1: when added to analysis form volatile compounds, could remove the components from the blank before analysis of the atomization analysis. Example: NH 4 NO 3 , ascorbic acid, oxalic acid… - Group 2: Group of substances when added to the sample analysis can form thermal stability compounds, difficult evaporation. So allowing raises the temperature of ash, chemical atom, retaining the analyte and the background of the high temperature. This group can be said to nitrates of Pd, Mg, Ni, Cu or sodium phosphate and ammonium NH 4 H 2 PO 4 and (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 Besides the two types can be combined in order to increase the likelihood of the background, rising temperatures of atoms, so will get better results. However, the laboratory conditions, we choose substances modified Pd (NO 3 ) 2 , Mg(NO 3 ) 2 , Ni(NO 3 ) 2 , and NH 4 H 2 PO 4
to survey and select the appropriate material modifications. Table 3: Survey the effects of chemical substances modified modf Pd (NO 3 ) 2 Mg(NO 3 ) 2 Ni(NO 3 ) 2 NH 4 H 2 PO 4 Abs RSD Abs RSD Abs RSD Abs RSD 25